Flock Cameras Startup is Now the Great Tracking Fight. It started because of a string of car burglaries in Langley’s own neighborhood. He and two other Georgia Tech alumni began this as a side project and built the first tracking cameras by hand. Later, a DeKalb County (GA) detective told Langley his camera solved a home break-in. This prompted Langley to have the “AHA” moment to add three other people and was then able to publicly launch Flock Safety in March 2017. The situation is similar to a pot boiling.
And that pot has boiled on nearly every road trip route in America ever since. These cameras now sit at highway on-ramps, city limits and even the rural areas.
The Original Products were Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) Cameras Leading to Growth
The ALPR cameras were made with the idea of data feeding back to law enforcement in real time, allowing for a fast recovery of information. This is the problem that Langley had noticed in his neighborhood and was trying to use these cameras as a solution. The growth of his company gives you an idea of the ready acceptance in the U.S. The Flock company may be expanding cautiously overseas, but having offices in Canada and the U.K. are just early-stage testing, not a full launch as in the U.S.
Within 5 years, the company was valued over $1 Billion dollars. In 2023, they were among the fastest-growing companies in the U.S. Funding was led by Andreessen Horowitz (he was with Greenoaks Capital) and Bedrock Capital also participating, gave major funding of $275M for Flock in 2025. The current scale (2026) results in over 5,000 communities across 49 states. How many scans? The answer is more than 20 billion vehicle scans per month, and a value of $8.4 billion.
Nola’s Notes–Oh, and one more thing. 5,000 communities means this isn’t just a big-city thing. Small towns along quiet highways have them, too. I just passed one today in my rural area. So, it isn’t “Will I pass one?” It’s “How many?”
The business model was not just for license plates reading. Its “Vehicle Fingerprint” technology included several other characteristics of the vehicle. It gave vehicle type, make, color, missing or covered plates, bumper stickers, decals and even roof racks. My questions would be, “Who is in charge of the security within Flock?” Who can Access the information? How? Is this really going to work?
Who’s Really Using the Information?
Flock sells the cameras to law enforcement, homeowner associations, neighborhood groups, businesses and even municipalities. Where does the data go? It goes back to law enforcement in real time because it’s considered a tool for crime prevention and investigations. This information is shared, but not to “all law enforcement.”
Sharing is an opt-in option. Here’s how it’s broken down.
- Your own department’s cameras stay private by default. Unless, someone actively turns on the sharing button.
- There is a 1 to 1 sharing. Your department can share with one specific group, or everyone in a set radius (maybe listed in miles) or the choice of statewide.
- This is the incentive structure that started the pot to boil. It’s called National Lookup. Any one department or group can flip a toggle that has the camera’s history join Flock’s nationwide network. Every camera from every other agency/department/group that has opted in gets the same privilege. It’s “show me yours, I’ll show you mine.” This is how Flock grew, giving every search a reason and a drop-down category plus a case number. Every search is logged permanently within an audit trail and it is visible to every agency whose camera was accessed.
Can the Federal System Use Flock’s Information?
What about the federal system? Flock’s official position is that it doesn’t sell or partner with federal agencies in its National or State Lookup networks by default. ICE is also excluded. But, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) found Flock’s standard customer agreement INCLUDES language granting Flock itself broad rights to disclose agency data to federal or local agencies “for investigative purposes.” Even if the local department has tried to restrict sharing.
For comparison, Ring shut down their Request for Assistance back in January 2024 after privacy backlash. Now, they use Community Requests that has anonymity option, opt-out, and per-clip consent required from a human being that says “Yes,” for each request.
Ring also in February 2026, ended its Flock partnership with Flock’s ALPR integration. Flock’s National Lookup network, once they have toggled the opt-in, share all plate data continuously and automatically, with no per-search consent from anyone whose car passed the camera’s eye. The pot continues to boil about the “Who’s watching?” angle.
Flock’s solution, in early 2026, was to give agencies a way to flip a single administration setting to disable all federal sharing. Now, Flock contends that it has removed federal agencies from the lookup networks altogether.
Senator Ron Wyden from Oregon, (term runs through January, 2027), who was conducting oversight on Flock’s data-sharing practices indicated that Flock told his office roughly 75 percent of its law enforcement customers have opted into National Lookup. Cameras catch criminals, but are also catching regular people by accident or sometimes on purpose. Who do you believe?
When the Flock Cameras get Misused
Most of the time, the Flock cameras actually work well. It’s when a human being decides to break the “rules of engagement.” Flock had to add a new audit tool after a Kentucky officer tracked his ex over 2,000 times. (1.) There was a Texas deputy who ran 83,000 searches in order to help an abusive partner find a woman. It was a personal health issue. Flock’s response was to shorten the data storage, too. The CEO apologized publicly. (2.)
Who’s Paying and Who’s Walking Away
Taxpayers fund the police contracts at about $3,000 per camera. (3.) HOA dues can fund neighborhood cameras. Businesses have to pay for their own. Remember, this is not available to “regular citizens.” We use consumer home security such as Ring or Blink and Google Nest or Wyze.
Other companies that do license-plate and AI surveillance networks are Motorola Solutions, Genetec (Canadian), Rekor Systems and the Digital Recognition network, a commercial plate-data broker. This last one is unregulated by any state ALPR statute and privacy advocates note that state laws only regulate the police, not the private data market group that exists below the police radar.
Since 2021, 214 cities have dropped Flock. In August of 2026, 93 were added to that number. It includes Pflugerville, TX backed out of the deal. They found that outside agencies could see its data. Over in Hopkinton, MA, they cancelled the contract since it broke their state laws. But Flock says that new contracts still outnumber cancellations 10 to 1 and Flock Safety is still growing.
The Story Doesn’t End Here
If you’ve looked at your trending feed lately, you know this isn’t the end of the story. Congress is watching. States are writing new rules. And there’s still one question nobody’s answered yet. Does the law enforcement department have the right to track your car like this in the first place? That question is sitting in a courtroom right now.
Resources
(1.) article: “Kentucky officer Flock stalking arrest”
(2.) article: “Flock CEO apology Washington Post 46 cases”
(3.) article: “surveillant.ai Flock pricing”
Thank you for visiting Nola’s Global Skies!
Curiosity brought you here and there is always more to discover. Whether you are exploring health, travel, beauty, or building something new for yourself, this community grows with you. When you are ready to connect, Contact Us and let’s find out what is possible together. More is waiting inside when you are ready.